The two body problem in the presence of dark energy and modified gravity: application to the Local Group
We explore mass estimation of the Local Group via the use of the simple, dynamical `timing argument' in the context of a variety of theories of dark energy and modified gravity: a cosmological constant, a perfect fluid with constant equation of state w, quintessence (minimally coupled scalar fi...
Saved in:
Published in | Journal of cosmology and astroparticle physics Vol. 2020; no. 9; p. 56 |
---|---|
Main Authors | , |
Format | Journal Article |
Language | English |
Published |
Bristol
IOP Publishing
01.09.2020
|
Subjects | |
Online Access | Get full text |
Cover
Loading…
Summary: | We explore mass estimation of the Local Group via the use of the simple, dynamical `timing argument' in the context of a variety of theories of dark energy and modified gravity: a cosmological constant, a perfect fluid with constant equation of state w, quintessence (minimally coupled scalar field), MOND, and symmetrons (coupled scalar field). We explore generic coupled scalar field theories, with the symmetron model as an explicit example. We find that theories which attempt to eliminate dark matter by fitting rotation curves produce mass estimates in the timing argument which are not compatible with the luminous mass of the galaxies alone. Assuming that the galaxies are approaching their first encounter, MOND gives a mass of around 2.7×1010M⊙, roughly 10% of the luminous mass of the LG, although a higher mass can be obtained in the case of a previous fly-by event between the MW and M31. The symmetron model suggests a mass too high to be explained without additional dark matter ( (1012)M⊙), suggesting that there is a missing mass problem in this model. We also demonstrate that tensions in measurements of H0 can produce an uncertainty in the Local Group mass estimate comparable to observational uncertainties on the separation and relative velocity of the galaxies, with values for the mass ranging from 4.4–5.3×1012M⊙ varying h between 0.63 and 0.76. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 1475-7516 1475-7516 |
DOI: | 10.1088/1475-7516/2020/09/056 |