Performance Analysis of Centralized and Partially Decentralized Co-Operative Networks

We consider cellular networks with co-operative clusters of neighboring base stations detecting multiple in-cluster users subject to interference from out-of-cluster users. We assume that the base stations, equipped with multiple antennas, are connected to a central processor in each cluster. For su...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inIEEE transactions on communications Vol. 64; no. 2; pp. 863 - 875
Main Authors Senanayake, Rajitha, Yeoh, Phee Lep, Evans, Jamie S.
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published New York IEEE 01.02.2016
The Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers, Inc. (IEEE)
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:We consider cellular networks with co-operative clusters of neighboring base stations detecting multiple in-cluster users subject to interference from out-of-cluster users. We assume that the base stations, equipped with multiple antennas, are connected to a central processor in each cluster. For such a network, we first consider centralized processing where all the in-cluster user signals are sent to the central processor for linear minimum mean squared error (LMMSE) estimation. Next, we consider partially decentralized processing where the in-cluster user signals are locally estimated at each base station, and the local estimates are combined at the central processor. For both processing architectures, we derive new expressions for the achievable rate of an in-cluster user when the channels between the users and base stations are subject to independent Rayleigh fading and distance-dependent path loss. The solutions are based on accurate approximations we derive for the characteristic function (CF) and the probability density function (PDF) of each user's signal-to-interference-plus-noise ratios (SINRs). Numerical examples highlight the accuracy of the analysis and compare the performance of centralized and partially decentralized processing under different cluster scenarios.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 14
content type line 23
ISSN:0090-6778
1558-0857
DOI:10.1109/TCOMM.2015.2512918