Microkeratome-assisted preparation of ultrathin grafts for descemet stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty

• Published in: Investigative ophthalmology & visual science Vol. 53; no. 1; pp. 521 - 524
• Main Authors: Busin, Massimo, Patel, Amit K, Scorcia, Vincenzo, Ponzin, Diego
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: United States 31.01.2012
• Subjects: Aged; Corneal Diseases - surgery; Descemet Membrane - surgery; Descemet Stripping Endothelial Keratoplasty - methods; Equipment Design; Eye Banks; Follow-Up Studies; Humans; Middle Aged; Miniaturization - instrumentation; Reproducibility of Results; Tissue and Organ Harvesting - instrumentation; Tissue Donors
• ISSN: 1552-5783; 1552-5783
• DOI: 10.1167/iovs.11-7753

To compare three microkeratome-assisted techniques for the preparation of ultrathin (UT) grafts for Descemet stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty. After dissection with a 300-μm microkeratome head in 40 donor tissues, a second cut was performed with a 130-μm head either after manual stromal hydration (group A, n = 10) or osmotic hydration at the eye bank (group B, n = 10) or with a 50- or 90-μm head, depending on residual bed thickness (group C, n = 10); no further dissection was performed in the control group (group D, n = 10). Corneal thickness and endothelial cell (EC) count were determined at all appropriate stages. Statistical analysis was performed using a Fisher exact test. Final graft thicknesses in groups A (89.1 ± 34.1μm), B (84.1 ± 18.6 μm), and C (72.1 ± 10.1 μm) were significantly lower than in group D (201.9 ± 25.3 μm) (P < 0.001). EC loss did not differ significantly among the groups. Multiple areas of Descemet detachment were seen in 4 of 10 corneas of group A. All methods proved equally efficient in producing UT grafts, but stromal hydration induced tissue structural changes. EC loss was unaffected by the additional manipulation required to prepare UT grafts.