Degree of handedness: A unique individual differences factor for predicting and understanding hindsight bias

• Published in: Personality and individual differences Vol. 125; pp. 97 - 101
• Main Authors: Bhattacharya, Chandrima, Jasper, John D.
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: Oxford Elsevier Ltd 15.04.2018; Elsevier Science Ltd
• Subjects: Anchoring; Belief updating; Bias; Decision making; Handedness; Hindsight bias; Individual differences; Knowledge; Memory; Memory bias; Neuroscience; Neurosciences; Personality traits; Psychology; Handedness; Neuroscience; Belief updating; Memory; Individual differences; Anchoring; Hindsight bias
• ISSN: 0191-8869; 1873-3549
• DOI: 10.1016/j.paid.2017.12.036

Hindsight bias is a pervasive error in judgment and decision making. Thus, predicting when and why it occurs is an important task. The present study was designed to directly compare two methods that elicit potentially different kinds of hindsight bias and to relate the magnitude of the bias to degree of handedness, a neurologically-related individual difference variable associated with differences in both memory performance and anchoring. 160 introductory psychology students were given 64 general knowledge questions, half under “memory instructions” and the other half under “hypothetical instructions”. Results indicated that individuals showed greater hindsight bias under hypothetical than memory instructions, replicating previous research. They also showed that consistent right-handers are relatively more affected under memory instructions, while inconsistent-handers are relatively more affected under hypothetical instructions. In sum, the current study demonstrates that two kinds of hindsight bias exist, and the kind that emerges depends on both the person and situational context. The findings also suggest that different mechanisms may be involved, these mechanisms may have neurological underpinnings, and a multicomponent model of hindsight bias may be best for future theorizing. •We used handedness to predict the occurrence and magnitude of hindsight bias.•Mixed (inconsistent)-handers showed more bias under “hypothetical” instructions.•Strong (consistent)-handers showed more bias under “memory” instructions.•This suggests that hindsight bias may have neurological underpinnings.•We argue a multicomponent model of hindsight bias may be best for future theorizing.