Instructional Practices of Teachers Enrolled in Educational Technology and General Education Programs

This study investigated classroom practices of 38 teachers enrolled in university masters' degree programs in educational technology and in other areas of education. The classroom practices related to five key concepts associated with educational technology: (a) learner-centered instruction, (b...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inEducational technology research and development Vol. 46; no. 3; pp. 81 - 97
Main Authors Bober, Marcie J., Sullivan, Howard J., Lowther, Deborah L., Harrison, Patrick
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Heidelberg Association for Educational Communications and Technology 01.01.1998
Springer
Springer Nature B.V
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:This study investigated classroom practices of 38 teachers enrolled in university masters' degree programs in educational technology and in other areas of education. The classroom practices related to five key concepts associated with educational technology: (a) learner-centered instruction, (b) instructional design, (c) media and technology, (d) assessment, and (e) instructional alignment. Teachers rated their frequency of use of desirable practices in these five areas on a 30-item Likert type survey. In addition, one class of students per teacher rated its own teacher's frequency of use of the practices on 20 items parallel to items on the teacher survey. The mean overall rating across all teachers for the classroom practice items was very close to Often, or 4.0, on the 5point scale. There were few reported differences between the teachers enrolled in educational technology programs and those enrolled in other education programs. Student ratings indicated less frequent teacher use of the desirable practices on 16 of the 20 common items, with significantly lower student ratings on 8 of these items. However, there was strong teacher-student agreement on several other comparisons.
ISSN:1042-1629
1556-6501
DOI:10.1007/BF02299763