The role of social value orientation on delay discounting in a group context

Two studies examined the role of social value orientation (SVO) on group-context delay discounting (GDD). SVO classifications were determined from responses on the Decomposed Prisoner's Dilemma game. GDD was assessed with a version of the Monetary Choice Questionnaire, where participants indica...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inPersonality and individual differences Vol. 187; p. 111401
Main Authors Roth, Michelle R., Loya, Jennifer M., Yi, Richard
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Oxford Elsevier Ltd 01.03.2022
Elsevier Science Ltd
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:Two studies examined the role of social value orientation (SVO) on group-context delay discounting (GDD). SVO classifications were determined from responses on the Decomposed Prisoner's Dilemma game. GDD was assessed with a version of the Monetary Choice Questionnaire, where participants indicated preference between immediate and delayed hypothetical monetary rewards for themselves and an “Other.” Study 1 compared GDD among the three SVO classifications. Results found that Competitors had the highest rate of GDD with no difference between Prosocials and Individualists (ηp2 = 0.0488). Given unbalanced distribution of SVO classifications, Study 2 incorporated valence (e.g., like versus dislike) as a factor for the “Other” in the SVO and GDD tasks. Having a “disliked Other” in the SVO task resulted in a more equal distribution across SVO classifications, and comparison of GDD between these groups replicated the finding from Study 1 that Competitors exhibited higher GDD compared to Prosocials (ηp2 = 0.0193). Overall, these findings suggest that SVO is an important individual-level factor that moderates the impact of group context on delay discounting. •SVO may moderate the effect of group context on delay discounting.•Prosocials exhibited lower group context DD compared to competitors.•SVO should inform group context strategies that might impact DD.
ISSN:0191-8869
1873-3549
DOI:10.1016/j.paid.2021.111401