Perception of coercion during contraceptive counseling among individuals with HIV

• Published in: Sexual & reproductive healthcare Vol. 34; p. 100791
• Main Authors: Lazenby, Gweneth B., Sundstrom, Beth L., Momplaisir, Florence M., Badell, Martina L., Rahangdale, Lisa, Nissim, Oriel A., Tarleton, Jessica L., Dempsey, Angela R.
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: Elsevier B.V 01.12.2022
• Subjects: Coercion; Contraception; Counseling; HIV; LARC; Shared-decision making; Shared-decision making; Contraception; HIV; LARC; Coercion; Counseling
• ISSN: 1877-5756; 1877-5764
• DOI: 10.1016/j.srhc.2022.100791

•Overall satisfaction with provider contraceptive counseling was high among postpartum individuals with HIV.•Few individuals with HIV felt pressured to use long-acting reversible contraception postpartum.•Perceived coercion was more likely when a provider suggested a specific postpartum contraceptive method.•Our findings emphasize the need to use shared-decision making during contraceptive counseling to reduced perceived coercion among vulnerable populations. Historically, individuals with HIV have reported feeling coerced during contraceptive counseling or experienced forced sterilization. The purpose of this study was to assess perceptions of coercion related to counseling and influence on postpartum contraceptive choice among individuals with HIV. This is a mixed methods study conducted in Georgia, North Carolina, Pennsylvania, and South Carolina between March 2020 and June 2021. Participants completed a survey to assess their experiences with contraception counseling and perceived coercion. An Interpersonal Quality of Family Planning (IQFP) care score was calculated to assess quality of counseling. Qualitative analyses were performed on narrative responses. Bivariate and regression analyses were used to evaluate factors associated with perceived coercion and IQFP scores. 100 surveys were collected. The median age of respondents was 29 (IQR 24–35). The median IQFP score was 53 (IQR 44–55) and 45 % of individuals had a maximum IQFP score of 55. Most individuals (96 %) report that a provider “did a good job” explaining contraceptive options and 26 % report their provider’s preference affected their contraceptive choice to some degree. Few (11 %) respondents felt pressured to use long-acting reversible contraception postpartum. This perceived coercion was more likely when a provider suggested a specific contraceptive method, aOR 6.1 [95 % CI 1.1–33.1] and such specific provider suggestions were reported by one-third of respondents. While perceived coercion was reported by few individuals with HIV, it was strongly associated with the provider making a specific method suggestion. Disproportionate provider influence in the final contraceptive decision occurred in one-quarter of individuals. More research is needed to discern to what extent provider preference compromises patient autonomy in shared decision-making.