Thermal chemistry of diiodomethane on Ni(1 1 0) surfaces I. Clean and hydrogen-covered

The thermal chemistry of diiodomethane on Ni(1 1 0) single-crystal surfaces was studied by temperature-programmed desorption (TPD) and X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS). Diiodomethane was chosen as a precursor for the formation of methylene surface species. I 3d and C 1s XPS data indicated that...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inSurface science Vol. 547; no. 3; pp. 284 - 298
Main Authors Guo, Hansheng, Zaera, Francisco
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Lausanne Elsevier B.V 20.12.2003
Amsterdam Elsevier Science
New York, NY
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:The thermal chemistry of diiodomethane on Ni(1 1 0) single-crystal surfaces was studied by temperature-programmed desorption (TPD) and X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS). Diiodomethane was chosen as a precursor for the formation of methylene surface species. I 3d and C 1s XPS data indicated that, indeed, adsorbed diiodomethane undergoes the C–I bond dissociations needed for that transformation, and detection of iodomethane production in TPD experiments pointed to the stepwise nature of those reactions. Significant amounts of methane are produced from further thermal activation of the chemisorbed methylene groups. This involves surface hydrogen, both coadsorbed from background gases and produced by dehydrogenation of some of the adsorbed diiodomethane, and can be induced at temperatures as low as about 160 K, right after the C–I bond breaking steps. Unique to this system is the detection of significant amounts, up to 10% of the total CH 2I 2 adsorbed, of heavier hydrocarbons, including ethene, ethane, propene, propane, and butene. Deuterium labeling experiments were used to provide support for a mechanism where the initial hydrogenation of some adsorbed methylene to methyl moieties is followed by a rate-limiting methylene insertion step to yield ethyl intermediates. Facile subsequent β-hydride elimination and reductive elimination with coadsorbed hydrogen account for the formation of ethene and ethane, respectively, while a second and third methylene insertions lead to C 3 and C 4 production. Based on the final product distribution, the methylene insertion was estimated to be approximately 20 times slower than the following hydrogenation–dehydrogenation reactions. Normal kinetic isotope effects were observed for most of the hydrogenation and dehydrogenation reactions involved.
ISSN:0039-6028
1879-2758
DOI:10.1016/j.susc.2003.10.028