Comparison of the discrete dipole approximation and the discrete source method for simulation of light scattering by red blood cells

The discrete sources method (DSM) and the discrete dipole approximation (DDA) were compared for simulation of light scattering by a red blood cell (RBC) model. We considered RBCs with diameters up to 8 mum (size parameter up to 38), relative refractive indices 1.03 and 1.06, and two different orient...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inOptics express Vol. 18; no. 6; pp. 5681 - 5690
Main Authors Gilev, Konstantin V, Eremina, Elena, Yurkin, Maxim A, Maltsev, Valeri P
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published United States 15.03.2010
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:The discrete sources method (DSM) and the discrete dipole approximation (DDA) were compared for simulation of light scattering by a red blood cell (RBC) model. We considered RBCs with diameters up to 8 mum (size parameter up to 38), relative refractive indices 1.03 and 1.06, and two different orientations. The agreement in the angle-resolved S(11) element of the Mueller matrix obtained by these methods is generally good, but it deteriorates with increasing scattering angle, diameter and refractive index of a RBC. Based on the DDA simulations with very fine discretization (up to 93 dipoles per wavelength) for a single RBC, we attributed most of the disagreement to the DSM, which results contain high-frequency ripples. For a single orientation of a RBC the DDA is comparable to or faster than the DSM. However, the relation is reversed when a set of particle orientations need to be simulated at once. Moreover, the DSM requires about an order of magnitude less computer memory. At present, application of the DSM for massive calculation of light scattering patterns of RBCs is hampered by its limitations in size parameter of a RBC due to the high number of harmonics used for calculations.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
ISSN:1094-4087
1094-4087
DOI:10.1364/OE.18.005681