“Windows of opportunity” for dinoflagellate blooms: Reduced microzooplankton net growth coupled to eutrophication

Links between eutrophication, plankton community structure, microzooplankton grazing and dinoflagellate abundance were investigated in two tributaries of the Chesapeake Bay, the Choptank and Patuxent Rivers (MD, USA). Sampling and experiments were conducted during the spring of consecutive dry (belo...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inHarmful algae Vol. 8; no. 1; pp. 158 - 166
Main Authors Stoecker, Diane K., Thessen, Anne E., Gustafson, Daniel E.
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Elsevier B.V 01.12.2008
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:Links between eutrophication, plankton community structure, microzooplankton grazing and dinoflagellate abundance were investigated in two tributaries of the Chesapeake Bay, the Choptank and Patuxent Rivers (MD, USA). Sampling and experiments were conducted during the spring of consecutive dry (below average freshwater flow) and wet (above average freshwater flow) years. During the wet year (2003), dissolved inorganic nitrogen, phytoplankton, and copepod biomass, but not microzooplankton abundance, were greater than in the dry year. In 2003, but not 2002, small cell size photosynthetic dinoflagellates were abundant and blooms occurred in both rivers. Average potential microzooplankton grazing pressure on small dinoflagellates was spatially and temporally variable, but was not significantly different between years. Our data suggest that the variability in microzooplankton grazing pressure provided “windows of opportunity” for net growth of dinoflagellates in response to nutrient loading. The lack of net population growth of micrograzers in response to increases in dinoflagellate prey allowed dinoflagellate blooms to reach relatively high densities, however grazing also appeared to be important in limitation or demise of some blooms. We hypothesize that uncoupling of micrograzer–prey dynamics was partly due to strong top-down control by copepods of microzooplankton in the proportionately more eutrophic year, and perhaps also due to inhibition of microzooplankton grazing/growth once dinoflagellate densities are high.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
ISSN:1568-9883
1878-1470
DOI:10.1016/j.hal.2008.08.021