Hub metastatic gene signature and risk score of breast cancer patients with small tumor sizes using WGCNA

Background Breast cancer (BC) is the most common cancer in women and accounts for approximately 15% of all cancer deaths among women globally. The underlying mechanism of BC patients with small tumor size and developing distant metastasis (DM) remains elusive in clinical practices. Methods We integr...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inBreast cancer (Tokyo, Japan) Vol. 31; no. 6; pp. 1114 - 1129
Main Authors Chang, Yu-Tien, Hong, Zhi-Jie, Tsai, Hsueh-Han, Feng, An-Chieh, Huang, Tzu-Ya, Yu, Jyh-Cherng, Hsu, Kuo-Feng, Huang, Chi-Cheng, Lin, Wei-Zhi, Chu, Chi-Ming, Liang, Chia-Ming, Liao, Guo-Shiou
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Singapore Springer Nature Singapore 01.11.2024
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:Background Breast cancer (BC) is the most common cancer in women and accounts for approximately 15% of all cancer deaths among women globally. The underlying mechanism of BC patients with small tumor size and developing distant metastasis (DM) remains elusive in clinical practices. Methods We integrated the gene expression of BCs from ten RNAseq datasets from Gene Expression Omnibus (GEO) database to create a genetic prediction model for distant metastasis-free survival (DMFS) in BC patients with small tumor sizes (≤ 2 cm) using weighted gene co-expression network (WGCNA) analysis and LASSO cox regression. Results ABHD11, DDX39A, G3BP2, GOLM1, IL1R1, MMP11, PIK3R1, SNRPB2, and VAV3 were hub metastatic genes identified by WGCNA and used to create a risk score using multivariable Cox regression. At the cut-point value of the median risk score, the high-risk score (≥ median risk score) group had a higher risk of DM than the low-risk score group in the training cohort [hazard ratio (HR) 4.51, p  < 0.0001] and in the validation cohort (HR 5.48, p  = 0.003). The nomogram prediction model of 3-, 5-, and 7-year DMFS shows good prediction results with C -indices of 0.72–0.76. The enriched pathways were immune regulation and cell–cell signaling. EGFR serves as the hub gene for the protein–protein interaction network of PIK3R1, IL1R1, MMP11, GOLM1, and VAV3. Conclusion Prognostic gene signature was predictive of DMFS for BCs with small tumor sizes. The protein–protein interaction network of PIK3R1, IL1R1, MMP11, GOLM1, and VAV3 connected by EGFR merits further experiments for elucidating the underlying mechanisms. Graphical abstract
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
ISSN:1340-6868
1880-4233
1880-4233
DOI:10.1007/s12282-024-01627-w