When loyalty binds: Examining the effectiveness of group versus personal loyalty calls on followers’ compliance with leaders’ unethical requests

• Published in: Organizational behavior and human decision processes Vol. 181; p. 104310
• Main Author: Hildreth, John Angus D.
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: Elsevier Inc 01.03.2024
• Subjects: Groups; Leadership; Loyalty; Morality; Unethical behavior; Well-being; Leadership; Morality; Well-being; Loyalty; Unethical behavior; Groups
• ISSN: 0749-5978; 1095-9920
• DOI: 10.1016/j.obhdp.2024.104310

•Calling on loyalty increases followers’ compliance with leaders’ unethical requests.•Appealing to group loyalty is more effective than appealing to personal loyalty.•Group loyalty calls help followers more easily rationalize their loyal deceit.•Group loyalty calls prompt followers to feel better about their loyal deceit.•Group loyalty calls are thus an effective leadership influence strategy. When leaders call on their followers’ loyalty, is it an effective strategy, particularly when such loyalty calls conflict with other ethical duties? And, if calling on loyalty is an effective strategy, when and why are such appeals more effective? These questions were examined in six studies measuring the unethical compliance of workers interacting online, students working together in classroom and fraternity members collaborating in their houses. Findings revealed that the effectiveness of leaders’ loyalty calls depended critically on the target of loyalty: calling on group loyalty was generally more effective than calling on personal loyalty to the leader in eliciting followers’ compliance with leaders’ unethical requests and in helping followers feel better about their deceit because such calls helped followers to rationalize their unethical behavior more easily. Thus, calling on group loyalty not only increases followers’ unethical behavior but also helps them feel righteous about their deceit.