Advantaged groups misperceive how allyship will be received

• Published in: Organizational behavior and human decision processes Vol. 181; p. 104309
• Main Authors: Birnbaum, Hannah J., Wilson, Desman, Waytz, Adam
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: Elsevier Inc 01.03.2024
• Subjects: Allyship; Diversity; Equity; Equity; Allyship; Diversity
• ISSN: 0749-5978; 1095-9920
• DOI: 10.1016/j.obhdp.2024.104309

Allyship is a way for advantaged groups to advance equity, yet acts of allyship are infrequent or limited. Here we explore a potential reason for this: a miscalibration between advantaged and disadvantaged groups’ perceptions of allyship. Studies 1a−2b demonstrate that advantaged groups (men in Studies 1a−1b; White people in Studies 2a−2b) underestimate how much disadvantaged groups (women in Studies 1a−1b; Black people in Studies 2a−2b) would appreciate various acts of allyship. Across these studies, relatively disadvantaged members (non– White men in Studies 1a−1b; White women in Studies 2a−2b) were better calibrated in their assessments than relatively advantaged members. Study 3 examines real, behavioral contexts whereby advantaged groups (men) underestimate disadvantaged groups’ (women’s) appreciation of allyship. Study 4 demonstrates that expectations about appreciation predict allyship intentions. Finally, Study 5 finds that highlighting appreciation of potential allyship can increase allyship intentions.