Removal of nonpalpable etonogestrel implants after fixation with a curved needle—A case series

To report our experiences with an extraction technique using a prebent, curved needle placed under deeply located single-rod implants to aid in removal. We conducted a retrospective case series of all patients who were referred for removal of a deeply located or nonpalpable implant to one single spe...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inContraception (Stoneham) Vol. 104; no. 5; pp. 577 - 580
Main Authors El-Hadad, Samia, Villars, Pierre, Kahr, Maike Katja, Leeners, Brigitte
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Elsevier Inc 01.11.2021
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:To report our experiences with an extraction technique using a prebent, curved needle placed under deeply located single-rod implants to aid in removal. We conducted a retrospective case series of all patients who were referred for removal of a deeply located or nonpalpable implant to one single specialized center between 2002 and 2019 by screening the database of the private office for “complex implants removals” or “nonpalpable implant” as a result for consultation. After implant-localization via high-resolution ultrasound, we performed a standard incision along the axis of the rod under local anesthesia. We fixed the rod by insertion of a curved needle directly beneath it piercing it through the tissue to the opposite side of the skin. After dissection of the subcutaneous tissue, we palpated the rod above the needle, grasped and removed it. In case of subfascial or intramuscular locations, we applied retractors and opened the fascia along the axis of the device to attempt removal. Of 117 referrals, medical records of 95 patients provided sufficient information to be included in our analysis. We could not palpate 81 (85%) devices and questionably palpate 14 (15%) implants. We successfully extracted all implants using this technique with an average removal duration of 30 minutes (SD +/- 6.8). Five (5.3%) patients noted intraoperative discomfort with 3 of them describing transient dysesthesia in the fingers innervated by the median nerve, which disappeared within a maximum of 48 hours. Following the described protocol, this novel technique reliably facilitates removal of nonpalpable or deeply located etonogestrel implants. This series of nonpalpable implants, all of which have been removed with the same standardized technique provides evidence that the given protocol permits successful extraction.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
ISSN:0010-7824
1879-0518
DOI:10.1016/j.contraception.2021.07.001