Comparing Telephone and Face-to-Face Qualitative Interviewing: a Research Note

This research note reports the results of a comparison of face-to-face interviewing with telephone interviewing in a qualitative study. The study was designed to learn visitors’ and correctional officers’ perceptions of visiting county jail inmates. The original study design called for all face-to-f...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inQualitative research : QR Vol. 4; no. 1; pp. 107 - 118
Main Authors Sturges, Judith E., Hanrahan, Kathleen J.
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published London SAGE Publications 01.04.2004
Sage Publications Ltd
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text
ISSN1468-7941
1741-3109
DOI10.1177/1468794104041110

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:This research note reports the results of a comparison of face-to-face interviewing with telephone interviewing in a qualitative study. The study was designed to learn visitors’ and correctional officers’ perceptions of visiting county jail inmates. The original study design called for all face-to-face interviews, but the contingencies of fieldwork required an adaptation and half of the interviews were conducted by phone. Prior literature suggested that the interview modes might yield different results. However, comparison of the interview transcripts revealed no significant differences in the interviews. With some qualifications, we conclude that telephone interviews can be used productively in qualitative research.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 14
ObjectType-Article-2
ObjectType-Feature-1
content type line 23
ISSN:1468-7941
1741-3109
DOI:10.1177/1468794104041110