Inconsistency and semantic unification

Baldwin et al. in their work Fril—fuzzy and evidential reasoning [Artificial Intelligence, Research Studies Press Ltd, Taunton, UK, 1995] present a semantic unification function for mass assignment logic. Its purpose is to evaluate the truth that a claim X is supported by evidence Y. This paper expo...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inFuzzy sets and systems Vol. 157; no. 18; pp. 2513 - 2539
Main Authors Patching, R.S., Hinde, C.J., McCoy, S.A.
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Amsterdam Elsevier B.V 16.09.2006
Elsevier
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:Baldwin et al. in their work Fril—fuzzy and evidential reasoning [Artificial Intelligence, Research Studies Press Ltd, Taunton, UK, 1995] present a semantic unification function for mass assignment logic. Its purpose is to evaluate the truth that a claim X is supported by evidence Y. This paper exposes some flaws with how the original unification function handles belief, possibility, and inconsistency. By making changes to the function this paper allows both interval and point-value semantic unification to be used in a more consistent and intuitive way.
ISSN:0165-0114
1872-6801
DOI:10.1016/j.fss.2006.05.006