Far-field positive phase blast parameter characterisation of RDX and PETN based explosives

• Published in: International journal of protective structures Vol. 15; no. 1; pp. 141 - 165
• Main Authors: Farrimond, Dain G, Woolford, Scott, Tyas, Andrew, Rigby, Sam E, Clarke, Samuel D, Barr, Andrew, Whittaker, Mark, Pope, Dan J
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: London, England SAGE Publications 01.03.2024
• Subjects: Blast parameter variability; numerical modelling; far-field; PETN; pressure gauges; RDX
• ISSN: 2041-4196; 2041-420X
• DOI: 10.1177/20414196221149752

A significant amount of scientific effort has been dedicated to measuring and understanding the effects of explosions, leading to the development of semi-empirical methods for rapid prediction of blast load parameters. The most well-known of these, termed the Kingery and Bulmash method, makes use of polylogarithmic curves derived from a compilation of medium to large scale experimental tests performed over many decades. However, there is still no general consensus on the accuracy and validity of this approach, despite some researchers reporting consistently high levels of agreement. Further, it is still not known whether blast loading can be considered deterministic, or whether it is intrinsically variable, the extent of this variability, and the range and scales over which these variations are observed. This article critically reviews historic and contemporary blast experiments, including newly generated arena tests with RDX and PETN-based explosives, with a view to demonstrating the accuracy with which blast load parameters can be predicted using semi-empirical approaches.