In different worlds: The contributions of polarization and platforms to partisan (mis)perceptions

Partisanship, polarization, and platforms are foundational to how people perceive contentious issues. Using a probability sample (n = 825), we examine these factors in tandem across four political claims concerning US presidential elections and the COVID-19 pandemic. We find Democrats and Republican...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inNew media & society
Main Authors Overgaard, Christian Staal Bruun, Collier, Jessica R
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published London, England SAGE Publications 06.06.2023
Subjects
Affective polarization
search engines
political belief
misinformation
survey
social media
partisanship
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

More Information
Summary:Partisanship, polarization, and platforms are foundational to how people perceive contentious issues. Using a probability sample (n = 825), we examine these factors in tandem across four political claims concerning US presidential elections and the COVID-19 pandemic. We find Democrats and Republicans differ in their belief in true and false claims, with each party believing more in pro-attitudinal claims than in counter-attitudinal claims. These results are especially pronounced for affectively polarized partisans. We also find interactions between partisanship and platform use where Republicans who use Google or Twitter are more likely to believe in false claims about COVID-19 than Republicans who do not use these platforms. Our findings highlight that Americans’ beliefs in political claims are associated with their political identity through both partisanship and polarization, and the use of search and social platforms appears critical to these relationships. These findings have implications for understanding why realities are malleable to voter preferences in liberal democracies.
ISSN:1461-4448
1461-7315
DOI:10.1177/14614448231176551