Fluid–rigid body coupling simulations with the passively moving solid model based on a physically consistent particle method

• Published in: Physics of fluids (1994) Vol. 36; no. 3
• Main Authors: Negishi, Hideyo, Kondo, Masahiro, Takahashi, Hidenao, Amakawa, Hiroaki, Obara, Shingo, Kurose, Ryoichi
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: Melville American Institute of Physics 01.03.2024
• Subjects: Angular momentum; Coupling; Cylinders; Particle methods (mathematics); Rigid structures; Rotating bodies; Surface tension; Thermodynamics; Wettability
• ISSN: 1070-6631; 1089-7666
• DOI: 10.1063/5.0190167

Fluid–rigid body interaction is a significant topic in research on particle methods. This study developed a fluid–rigid body coupling method based on a physically consistent particle method, i.e., the moving particle hydrodynamics (MPH) method, incorporating the passively moving solid (PMS) model. When the discrete particle system satisfies the fundamental laws of physics, i.e., mass conservation, linear and angular momentum conservation, and the second law of thermodynamics, the method is asserted physically consistent, and this feature is important for robust dynamic calculations. The PMS model is a pioneering approach that is practical for particle methods in which fluid and rigid-body particles are initially calculated as a fluid. Then, only rigid-body particles are modified to restore the initial shape by applying rigid-body constraints. Thus, combining the MPH method and the PMS model realizes a fluid–rigid body coupling method that satisfies fundamental physical laws. The proposed method was first verified via the fundamental rigid body and fluid–rigid body coupling problems: the Dzhanibekov effect on a T-shaped rigid body, a floating rectangular solid, a floating cylinder, and water entry of a two-dimensional cylinder. Second, the proposed method was validated via calculating a cylinder rolling on a liquid film as a fluid–rigid body coupling problem with rotation. By using a potential-based surface tension model, the computed results showed reasonable agreement with the experimental data obtained in this study. Overall, it was confirmed that the proposed method is a promising fluid–rigid body coupling approach, in which the surface tension and wettability can be considered as well.