Hybrid composites based on sisal fibers and silica nanoparticles

The progress in establishing new classes of biocomposites has led to potential applications in the automotive, aerospace, and construction industries because of their life cycle properties, low cost, lightweight, non‐abrasive, and moderate mechanical strength. The heterogeneity of natural fibers pla...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inPolymer composites Vol. 39; no. 1; pp. 146 - 156
Main Authors Vieira, Luciano Machado Gomes, Santos, Júlio Cesar dos, Panzera, Túlio Hallak, Christoforo, André Luiz, Mano, Valdir, Campos Rubio, Juan Carlos, Scarpa, Fabrizio
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Newtown Blackwell Publishing Ltd 01.01.2018
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:The progress in establishing new classes of biocomposites has led to potential applications in the automotive, aerospace, and construction industries because of their life cycle properties, low cost, lightweight, non‐abrasive, and moderate mechanical strength. The heterogeneity of natural fibers plays an important role in the fiber–matrix adhesion, therefore affecting the mechanical performance and the durability of the composites. This work has described the manufacturing, characterization, and testing of hybrid composites reinforced with sisal fibers and silica nanoparticles. A full factorial design was performed to identify the effects of fiber treatment, fiber orientation and nanosilica inclusion factors on the physical and mechanical properties of hybrid composites. Composites made with unidirectional untreated fibres and silica nanoparticles (2 wt%) provided higher impact resistance. In contrast, the highest strength and stiffness values and the lowest overall porosity were achieved when unidirectional treated fibres with 2 wt% of silica inclusions were considered. POLYM. COMPOS., 39:146–156, 2018. © 2016 Society of Plastics Engineers
Bibliography:This article was published online on 26 January 2016. An error was subsequently identified. This notice is included in the online and print versions to indicate that both have been corrected 24 November 2016.
ISSN:0272-8397
1548-0569
DOI:10.1002/pc.23915