Psychologic assessment in patients undergoing bariatric surgery

• Published in: Surgical endoscopy Vol. 38; no. 4; pp. 1922 - 1932
• Main Authors: Ferrin, Neal, Elian, Alain, Flewelling, Kayla, Nadeem, Muhammed, Nava, Kristofer, Berry, Shamsi Daneshvari, Stehlik, Kevin, Bella, Almontasser Kassier, Awad, Peter, Alfred, Andrew, Ksajikian, Andre, Chen, Kevin, Shebrain, Saad
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: New York Springer US 01.04.2024; Springer Nature B.V
• Subjects: Abdominal Surgery; Bariatric Surgery; Female; Gastrectomy - adverse effects; Gastric Bypass - adverse effects; Gastroenterology; Gastrointestinal surgery; Generalized linear models; Gynecology; Hepatology; Humans; Laparoscopy; Laparoscopy - adverse effects; Male; Medicine; Medicine & Public Health; Obesity, Morbid - surgery; Patient compliance; Postoperative period; Proctology; Psychological aspects; Retrospective Studies; Surgery; Treatment Outcome; Weight Loss; Psychological; Postoperative; Bariatric; Compliance; Weight loss
• ISSN: 0930-2794; 1432-2218
• DOI: 10.1007/s00464-023-10668-9

Background Psychological Clearance level (PCL) for patients undergoing metabolic and bariatric surgery (MBS) is a critical step for successful postoperative outcomes. This study aims to assess the relationship between the level of psychologic fitness and postoperative outcomes in patients undergoing MBS. Methods We retrospectively analyzed the data of patients who underwent MBS (laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy [LSG] and laparoscopic Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass [LRYGB]) and completed two years follow-up, between 2012 and 2019, in a single medical center. The patients were divided into four groups based on PCL, suggesting level of readiness for surgery: Group A (PCL-0: guarded), group B (PCL-1: Fair/reasonable), group C (PCL-2: Good/appropriate), and group D (PCL-3: Strong/excellent). Primary outcome was the percent of total body weight loss (%TWL), and the absolute change in BMI units. Secondary outcomes were missed postoperative visits and patient compliance. Differences between the groups were analyzed using a generalized linear model (GLM), chi-squared and exact Fisher tests, as appropriate. Results Of 1411 total patients, 607 (43.20%) had complete data at two years follow-up. 512 (84.34%) were females. LSG was performed in 361 (59.5%). No difference was found in %TWL between the four groups (22.14% vs. 28.0% vs. 26.0% vs. 24.8%, p  = 0.118). We found a small difference in the mean (SD) of absolute change in BMI between the groups, and on post-hoc analysis it was found between groups B (PCL-1) and D (PCL-3). Overall, no difference between the groups in number of follow-up visits, or compliance issues. However, patients who attended more follow-up visits had less compliance issues ( p  < 0.001). PCL is inversely correlated with number of psychologic diagnoses ( r  = − 0.41, p  < 0.001) and medical comorbidities ( r  = − 0.20, p  < 0.001). Conclusion We found no difference in the percent of TWL in patients who underwent MBS based on PCL at two -years follow-up. Medical comorbidities and psychiatric diagnoses impact the PCL. Graphical abstract