Occurrence of F-Specific Bacteriophages in Untreated and Treated Wastewaters in Mumbai

F + coliphages are considered as potential enteric viral indicators in water systems as a tool for on-site validation of wastewater treatment processes. The present study evaluated the occurrence of F + coliphages in wastewaters collected from three wastewater treatment plants (WWTPs) in Mumbai city...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inIndian journal of microbiology Vol. 64; no. 1; pp. 254 - 259
Main Authors Menon, Smita, Wani, Hima, Desai, Dipen, Bhathena, Zarine, Desai, Nishith, Shrivastava, Sandhya
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published New Delhi Springer India 01.03.2024
Springer Nature B.V
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:F + coliphages are considered as potential enteric viral indicators in water systems as a tool for on-site validation of wastewater treatment processes. The present study evaluated the occurrence of F + coliphages in wastewaters collected from three wastewater treatment plants (WWTPs) in Mumbai city, to assess this potential. The detection and enumeration of F + coliphages was carried out from WWTPs Z1, Z3 and Z5 using the ISO 10705–1 and U.S EPA 1601 methods. F + coliphages were majorly detected in untreated wastewater samples followed by a few secondary treated samples in WWTP-Z1 and Z3 and one tertiary treated sample from Z1, these differences were found to be statistically significant. The difference in F + coliphage levels between the treatment stages highlight their potential as indicators for monitoring the efficiency of wastewater treatment. The overall positivity of F + coliphage was 35.09% for Salmonella. typhimurium WG49 host (as per ISO 10705–1), was higher by 10.52% for Escherichia coli F amp HS host (as per U.S EPA 1601) (45.61%), highlighting the efficiency of the latter host over the former in F + coliphage detection. Significant difference in F + coliphage counts using the two bacterial hosts were observed in WWTP-Z3 ( p  =  0.001 ) and WWTP-Z1 ( p  =  0.047 ) but not in WWTP-Z5 ( p  =  0.332 ).
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
ISSN:0046-8991
0973-7715
DOI:10.1007/s12088-023-01181-7