Updated nutrient profiling system underlying nutri-score (Uns-Nps) and colorectal cancer risk

Background Globally, poor diet is responsible for about 8 million deaths for non-communicable diseases, including cancers, in 2019. One strategy to promote healthier choices by informing consumers about food nutritional properties is the Front-Of-Pack Nutrition Labels, like Nutri-Score. Our study in...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inEuropean journal of clinical nutrition Vol. 79; no. 7; pp. 635 - 640
Main Authors Franchi, Carlotta, Ardoino, Ilaria, Orsini, Francesca, Negri, Eva, Dal Maso, Luigino, Rossi, Silvia, Crispo, Anna, Augustin, Livia, Giacosa, Attilio, Mignozzi, Silvia, Bravi, Francesca, Turati, Federica, La Vecchia, Carlo
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published London Nature Publishing Group UK 01.07.2025
Nature Publishing Group
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:Background Globally, poor diet is responsible for about 8 million deaths for non-communicable diseases, including cancers, in 2019. One strategy to promote healthier choices by informing consumers about food nutritional properties is the Front-Of-Pack Nutrition Labels, like Nutri-Score. Our study investigated the association between the updated Nutrient Profiling System (uNS-NPS), underlying Nutri-Score, and Colorectal Cancer (CRC) risk. Methods Data from two hospital-based case-control studies were used. Cases were CRC patients, while controls were individuals admitted for acute non-neoplastic conditions. Dietary habits were assessed via a validated food frequency questionnaire. The uNS-NPS dietary index (uNS-NPS-DI) was derived as the weighted average of the uNS-NPS scores of every food/beverage, for the energy intake provided by that food/beverage. Logistic regression models were employed to estimate the odds ratios (OR) and the corresponding 95% confidence intervals (CI) for the association between uNS-NPS-DI (as continuous and as categorical variable, based on quartiles of its distribution among controls) and CRC risk, adjusting for known risk factors. Findings A total of 2419 cases and 4723 controls were analysed. uNS-NPS-DI distribution (median 6.14, IQR: 5.17–7.15) was similar between cases and controls. Individuals in the highest quartile of uNS-NPS-DI (i.e. with the lowest nutritional quality of their diet) compared to those in the lowest showed a higher CRC risk (OR 1.17, 95% CI: 1.01–1.36). Conclusions A diet with low nutritional quality as measured by the uNS-NPS was modestly associated with increased CRC risk.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 14
content type line 23
ISSN:0954-3007
1476-5640
1476-5640
DOI:10.1038/s41430-025-01590-5