Examining Concordance Between Self-Report and Biomedical HIV Viral Load Data: A Scoping Review

Assessment of HIV viral load based on laboratory results is the gold standard in HIV care and research. However, blood assay or accessing medical records is not always possible due to research or service contexts and constraints. Self-report of viral load test results expands data resources, is a co...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inAIDS and behavior Vol. 28; no. 1; pp. 93 - 104
Main Authors Dorshimer, Molly, Hirshfield, Sabina, Mayer, Joseph, Aidala, Angela A.
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published New York Springer US 2024
Springer Nature B.V
Subjects
Biomedical data
Biomedicine
Blood
Data collection
Health Psychology
HIV
HIV Infections - diagnosis
HIV Infections - epidemiology
HIV Testing
Human immunodeficiency virus
Humans
Infectious Diseases
Load tests
Measures
Medical records
Medicine
Medicine & Public Health
Populations
Public Health
Research Design
Self Report
Substantive Review
Surveillance
Viral Load
HIV/AIDS
Validation
Carga viral
Métodos de investigación
Validity of self-report
Validación
Validez de autoinforme
VIH/SIDA
Viral load
Research methods
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

More Information
Summary:Assessment of HIV viral load based on laboratory results is the gold standard in HIV care and research. However, blood assay or accessing medical records is not always possible due to research or service contexts and constraints. Self-report of viral load test results expands data resources, is a convenient method of collecting data in both research and service settings, and is useful for HIV surveillance. The purpose of this scoping review was to identify existing literature on the validity of self-reported viral load data compared to blood assay or medical record review. We found that the existing literature is limited, with varied data collection methods, self-report measures, and study designs, as well as predictors of accuracy. Concordance between self-reported viral load and biomedical data varied across studies but appeared to be more consistent among samples recruited from clinical populations that reported engagement in HIV care. While it is difficult to draw definitive conclusions about the validity of self-reported viral load across existing studies, there is a need for a standardized measure and method of collection that can be utilized across diverse populations living with HIV.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-2
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-3
content type line 23
ObjectType-Review-1
ISSN:1090-7165
1573-3254
DOI:10.1007/s10461-023-04136-7