Benefits versus harm of intraoperative glucocorticoid for postoperative nausea and vomiting prophylaxis
Intraoperative use of glucocorticoids is effective for postoperative nausea and vomiting prophylaxis and can also provide early postoperative analgesic effects, but the consequences for chronic post-surgical pain are debatable. In a secondary analysis of the large pragmatic Perioperative Administrat...
Saved in:
Published in | British journal of anaesthesia : BJA Vol. 131; no. 1; pp. 8 - 10 |
---|---|
Main Authors | , |
Format | Journal Article |
Language | English |
Published |
England
Elsevier Ltd
01.07.2023
|
Subjects | |
Online Access | Get full text |
Cover
Loading…
Summary: | Intraoperative use of glucocorticoids is effective for postoperative nausea and vomiting prophylaxis and can also provide early postoperative analgesic effects, but the consequences for chronic post-surgical pain are debatable. In a secondary analysis of the large pragmatic Perioperative Administration of Dexamethasone and Infection trial (n=8478), the primary outcome of pain at the surgical wound at 6 months after surgery was increased in subjects receiving dexamethasone 8 mg i.v. for postoperative nausea and vomiting prophylaxis, a dose not associated with the detrimental effect of surgical site infection in the original study. In contrast, a more detailed assessment of chronic post-surgical pain after exclusion of patients with preoperative pain at the surgical site showed no differences with or without intraoperative dexamethasone regarding chronic post-surgical pain characteristics (intensity and neuropathic features). Because of several confounding factors especially regarding surgical details, these unexpected findings call for more well-designed studies about the potential risk of intraoperative treatments, such as glucocorticoids, on late post-surgical pain. |
---|---|
Bibliography: | SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1 content type line 23 ObjectType-Editorial-2 ObjectType-Commentary-1 |
ISSN: | 0007-0912 1471-6771 1471-6771 |
DOI: | 10.1016/j.bja.2023.04.013 |