Impact of Patient Factors on Attendance at Remote Telehealth Swallow Therapy

• Published in: Dysphagia Vol. 39; no. 4; pp. 735 - 745
• Main Authors: Kariveda, Rohith R., Tran, Audrey, Velu, Preetha S., Jabbour, Nicolette, Pisegna, Jessica M., Tracy, Lauren F.
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: New York Springer US 01.08.2024; Springer Nature B.V
• Subjects: Cancer; Dysphagia; Gastroenterology; Gastroesophageal reflux; Hepatology; Imaging; Medicine; Medicine & Public Health; Original Article; Otorhinolaryngology; Patients; Radiology; Socioeconomic factors; Socioeconomic status; Swallowing; Telemedicine; Therapeutic applications; Dysphagia; Social Determinants of Health; Telemedicine; Telehealth; Swallow therapy; Laryngology
• ISSN: 0179-051X; 1432-0460; 1432-0460
• DOI: 10.1007/s00455-023-10654-2

In-person swallow therapy is a primary and effective treatment for dysphagia. However, remote telehealth is now a widely utilized component of healthcare delivery for therapeutic interventions. This study evaluates potential factors influencing attendance at telehealth swallow therapy. Retrospective review of 308 patients referred for telehealth swallow therapy from April 2020–November 2021 included patient referral diagnosis, diagnostic swallowing evaluations, and sociodemographic information including age, race, health insurance, interpreter use, and socioeconomic status. Univariable and multivariable analyses compared patient and appointment factors for those who attended telehealth swallow therapy with those who did not attend. Overall, 71.8% of patients attended at least one telehealth swallow therapy appointment while 28.2% did not attend any. The most common referral diagnoses were “Cancer” (19.2%) and “Dysphagia Unspecified” (19.2%). Patients diagnosed with “Cancer” and “Muscle Tension” were significantly less likely to attend telehealth swallow therapy compared to those with “Dysphagia Unspecified,” “Globus,” and “Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease/Laryngopharyngeal Reflux” after adjusting for covariates. Lower socioeconomic status (p = 0.023), no interpreter use (p < 0.001), and more diagnostic evaluations (p = 0.001) correlated with higher telehealth swallow therapy attendance. Race and sex did not correlate with attendance. Most patients referred to telehealth swallow therapy attended at least one appointment. Patients with dysphagia associated with cancer and muscle tension, those with higher socioeconomic status, interpreter use, and fewer diagnostic swallowing evaluations were less likely to attend telehealth swallow therapy. Future research should investigate and compare attendance and efficacy of telehealth swallow therapy with in-person therapy.