Caddoan Archaeology on the High Plains: A Critique

The interpretations of the Wallace site offered by Huffman and Earley are invalid. The site is not Upper Republican in affiliation, the structural remains in it do not support the interpretations made, and the proposed correspondences to Pawnee cosmology are based on unjustified assumptions.

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inAmerican antiquity Vol. 80; no. 4; p. 776
Main Authors Blakeslee, Donald J, Krause, Richard A, Logan, Brad, Roper, Donna C
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Washington Cambridge University Press 01.10.2015
Subjects
Archaeology
Cosmology
Keresiouan languages
Online AccessGet more information

Cover

More Information
Summary:The interpretations of the Wallace site offered by Huffman and Earley are invalid. The site is not Upper Republican in affiliation, the structural remains in it do not support the interpretations made, and the proposed correspondences to Pawnee cosmology are based on unjustified assumptions.
Bibliography:content type line 23
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ISSN:0002-7316
2325-5064
DOI:10.7183/0002-7316.80.4.776