Risk factors for adverse outcomes following paraesophageal hernia repair among obese patients

• Published in: Surgical endoscopy Vol. 37; no. 9; pp. 6791 - 6797
• Main Authors: Kanagasegar, Nithya, Alvarado, Christine E., Lyons, Joshua L., Rivero, Marco-Jose, Vekstein, Carolyn, Levine, Iris, Towe, Christopher W., Worrell, Stephanie G., Marks, Jeffrey M.
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: New York Springer US 01.09.2023; Springer Nature B.V
• Subjects: Abdominal Surgery; Dysphagia; Gastroenterology; Gastrointestinal surgery; Gynecology; Hepatology; Hernias; Medical imaging; Medicine; Medicine & Public Health; Proctology; Risk factors; Surgery; Obesity; Laparoscopy; Paraesophageal hernia; Surgery
• ISSN: 0930-2794; 1432-2218
• DOI: 10.1007/s00464-023-10115-9

Background Although obesity is an established risk factor for adverse outcomes after paraesophageal hernia repair (PEHR), many obese patients nonetheless receive PEHR. The purpose of this study was to explore risk factors for adverse outcomes of PEHR among this high-risk cohort. We hypothesized that obese patients may have other risk factors for adverse outcomes following PEHR. Methods A retrospective study of adult obese patients who underwent minimally invasive PEHR from 2017 to 2019 was performed. Patients were excluded for BMI < 30 or if they had concomitant bariatric surgery at time of PEHR. The primary outcome of interest was a composite adverse outcome (CAO) defined as having any of the four following outcomes after PEHR: persistent GERD > 30 d, persistent dysphagia > 30 d, recurrence, or reoperation. Chi-square and t-test analysis was used to compare demographic and clinical characteristics. Multivariable logistic regression analysis was used to evaluate independent predictors of CAO. Results In total, 139 patients met inclusion criteria with a median follow-up of 19.7 months (IQR 8.8–81). Among them, 51/139 (36.7%) patients had a CAO: 31/139 (22.4%) had persistent GERD, 20/139 (14.4%) had persistent dysphagia, 24/139 (17.3%) had recurrence, and 6/139 (4.3%) required reoperation. On unadjusted analysis, patients with a CAO were more likely to have a history of prior abdominal surgery (86.3% vs 70.5%, p  = 0.04) and were less likely to have undergone a preoperative CT scan (27.5% vs 45.5%, p  = 0.04). On multivariable analysis, previous abdominal surgery was independently associated with an increased likelihood of CAO whereas age and preoperative CT scan had a decreased likelihood of CAO. Conclusions Although there were adverse outcomes among obese patients, minimally invasive PEHR may be feasible in a subset of patients at specialized centers. These findings may help guide the appropriate selection of obese patients for PEHR.