The longitudinal relationship between angry rumination and reactive–proactive aggression and the moderation effect of consideration of future consequences‐immediate

• Published in: Aggressive behavior Vol. 46; no. 6; pp. 476 - 488
• Main Authors: Wang, Yueyue, Cao, Shen, Zhang, Qin, Xia, Ling‐Xiang
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: Hoboken Wiley Subscription Services, Inc 01.11.2020
• Subjects: Aggression; Aggressiveness; Anger; angry rumination; consideration of future consequences; Hypotheses; Males; moderating effects; Moderation; Motivation; proactive aggression; reactive aggression; Rumination; Subtypes; Undergraduate students
• ISSN: 0096-140X; 1098-2337
• DOI: 10.1002/ab.21913

The idea that influential factors for two subtypes of aggression (reactive and proactive aggression) should be different is popular, but the common influential factors have not been examined. Such an examination could help understand the influential factors of aggression from the perspective of multiple motivations affecting the development of aggressive motivations over time. The present study argued that angry rumination would be a common influential factor for both reactive and proactive aggression. In addition, consideration of future consequences (CFC) may moderate the longitudinal effect of angry rumination on proactive aggression. Two studies were conducted to test these hypotheses. In Study 1, a cross‐lagged analysis with a 6‐month interval was employed. A total of 505 undergraduate students (46% males) completed the questionnaires twice. Results indicated that after a 6‐month period, angry rumination predicted reactive aggression but not proactive aggression. Furthermore, reactive aggression predicted angry rumination over time. In Study 2, a moderation analysis was performed with another 437 participants (130 males). The results partly supported our hypotheses, indicating that CFC‐immediate (CFC‐I) moderated the longitudinal effect of angry rumination on proactive aggression. The present results extended prior research regarding the predictors of proactive and reactive aggression and may contribute to a greater understanding of the development of aggressive motivation. In addition, our research suggested that high CFC‐I may be an important factor for the motivation change from reactive aggression to proactive aggression.