Cellular and molecular outcomes of glutamine supplementation in the brain of succinic semialdehyde dehydrogenase‐deficient mice

Succinic semialdehyde dehydrogenase deficiency (SSADHD) manifests with low levels of glutamine in the brain, suggesting that central glutamine deficiency contributes to pathogenesis. Recently, we attempted to rescue the disease phenotype of aldh5a1−/− mice, a murine model of SSADHD with dietary glut...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inJIMD reports Vol. 56; no. 1; pp. 58 - 69
Main Authors Brown, Madalyn N., Gibson, K. Michael, Schmidt, Michelle A., Walters, Dana C., Arning, Erland, Bottiglieri, Teodoro, Roullet, Jean‐Baptiste
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Hoboken, USA John Wiley & Sons, Inc 01.11.2020
Wiley
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:Succinic semialdehyde dehydrogenase deficiency (SSADHD) manifests with low levels of glutamine in the brain, suggesting that central glutamine deficiency contributes to pathogenesis. Recently, we attempted to rescue the disease phenotype of aldh5a1−/− mice, a murine model of SSADHD with dietary glutamine supplementation. No clinical rescue and no central glutamine improvement were observed. Here, we report the results of follow‐up studies of the cellular and molecular basis of the resistance of the brain to glutamine supplementation. We first determined if the expression of genes involved in glutamine metabolism was impacted by glutamine feeding. We then searched for changes of brain histology in response to glutamine supplementation, with a focus on astrocytes, known regulators of glutamine synthesis in the brain. Glutamine supplementation significantly modified the expression of glutaminase (gls) (0.6‐fold down), glutamine synthetase (glul) (1.5‐fold up), and glutamine transporters (solute carrier family 7, member 5 [slc7a5], 2.5‐fold up; slc38a2, 0.6‐fold down). The number of GLUL‐labeled cells was greater in the glutamine‐supplemented group than in controls (P < .05). Reactive astrogliosis, a hallmark of brain inflammation in SSADHD, was confirmed. We observed a 2‐fold stronger astrocyte staining in mutants than in wild‐type controls (optical density/cell were 1.8 ± 0.08 in aldh5a1−/− and 0.99 ± 0.06 in aldh5a1+/+; P < .0001), and a 3‐fold higher expression of gfap and vimentin. However, glutamine supplementation did not improve the histological and molecular signature of astrogliosis. Thus, glutamine supplementation impacts genes implicated in central glutamine homeostasis without improving reactive astrogliosis. The mechanisms underlying glutamine deficiency and its contribution to SSADHD pathogenesis remain unknown and should be the focus of future investigations.
Bibliography:Johannes Häberle
Communicating Editor
Communicating Editor: Johannes Häberle
ISSN:2192-8312
2192-8304
2192-8312
DOI:10.1002/jmd2.12151