In vitro assessment of antimicrobial potential of low molecular weight chitosan and its ability to mechanically reinforce and control endogenous proteolytic activity of dentine

• Published in: International endodontic journal Vol. 56; no. 11; pp. 1337 - 1349
• Main Authors: Pascale, Christina, Geaman, Jay, Mendoza, Christine, Gao, Feng, Kaminski, Amber, Cuevas‐Nunez, Maria, Darvishan, Behnam, Mitchell, John C., Carrilho, Marcela R., Sigar, Ira
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: Chichester Wiley Subscription Services, Inc 01.11.2023
• Subjects: Antimicrobial activity; Antimicrobial agents; Biofilms; Biomaterials; Chitosan; Dental roots; Edetic acid; Endodontics; Molars; Molecular weight; Proteolysis; Root canals; Sodium hypochlorite
• ISSN: 0143-2885; 1365-2591
• DOI: 10.1111/iej.13962

Abstract Aims Chitosan‐based biomaterials exhibit several properties of biological interest for endodontic treatment. Herein, a low molecular weight chitosan (CH) solution was tested for its antimicrobial activity against Enterococcus faecalis ( E. faecalis ) and effects on dentine structure. Methodology The root canal of 27 extracted uniradicular teeth were biomechanically prepared, inoculated with a suspension of E. faecalis and randomly assigned to be irrigated with either 5.25% sodium hypochlorite (NaClO), 0.2% CH or sterile ultrapure water (W). Bacteriologic samples were collected from root canals and quantified for of E. faecalis colony‐forming units (CFUs). The effectiveness of CH over E. faecalis biofilms was further measured using the MBEC Assay®. Additionally, dentine beams and dentine powder were obtained, respectively, from crowns and roots of 20 extracted third molars. Dentine samples were treated or not with 17% EDTA and immersed in either CH or W for 1 min. The effects of CH on dentine structure were evaluated by assessment of the modulus of elasticity, endogenous proteolytic activity and biochemical modifications. Results The number of E. faecalis CFUs was significantly lower for samples irrigated with CH and NaClO. No significant differences were found between CH and NaClO treatments. Higher modulus of elasticity and lower proteolytic activity were reported for dentine CH‐treated specimens. Chemical interaction between CH and dentine was observed for samples treated or not with EDTA. Conclusions Present findings suggest that CH could be used as an irrigant during root canal treatment with the triple benefit of reducing bacterial activity, mechanically reinforcing dentine and inhibiting dentine proteolytic activity.