On-Ice Physical Demands of World-Class Women's Ice Hockey: From Training to Competition

To compare on-ice external and internal training loads in world-class women's ice hockey during training and competition. On-ice training load were collected during one season from 25 world-class ice hockey players via wearable technology. A total of 105 on-ice sessions were recorded, which con...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inInternational journal of sports physiology and performance p. 1
Main Authors Douglas, Adam, Rotondi, Michael A, Baker, Joseph, Jamnik, Veronica K, Macpherson, Alison K
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published United States 01.10.2019
Subjects
Online AccessGet more information

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:To compare on-ice external and internal training loads in world-class women's ice hockey during training and competition. On-ice training load were collected during one season from 25 world-class ice hockey players via wearable technology. A total of 105 on-ice sessions were recorded, which consisted of 61 training sessions and 44 matches. Paired and unpaired t-tests compared training and competition data between and across playing positions. For training data, there was a difference between positions for PlayerLoad (p < .001, ES = 0.32), PlayerLoad·min (p < .001, ES = 0.55), Explosive Efforts (p < .001, ES = 0.63), and TRIMP (p < .001, ES = 0.48). For the competition data, there were also differences between positions for PlayerLoad (p < .001, ES = 0.26), PlayerLoad·min (p < .001, ES = 0.38), Explosive Efforts (p < .001, ES = 0.64), and TRIMP (p < .001, ES = 1.47). Similar results were found when positions were viewed independently, competition had greater load and intensity across both positions for PlayerLoad, TRIMP, and Explosive Efforts (p < 0.001, ES = 1.59 - 2.98); and with PlayerLoad·min (p = 0.016, ES = 0.25) for the defense. There are clear differences in the volume and intensity of external and internal workloads between training and competition sessions. These differences were also evident when comparing the playing positions, with defense having lower outputs compared to forwards. These initial results can be used to design position-specific drills that replicate match demands for ice hockey athletes.
ISSN:1555-0273
DOI:10.1123/ijspp.2018-0571