On optimization of energy harvesting from base-excited vibration

This paper re-examines and clarifies the long-believed optimization conditions of electromagnetic and piezoelectric energy harvesting from base-excited vibration. In terms of electromagnetic energy harvesting, it is typically believed that the maximum power is achieved when the excitation frequency...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inJournal of sound and vibration Vol. 411; pp. 47 - 59
Main Authors Tai, Wei-Che, Zuo, Lei
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Amsterdam Elsevier Ltd 22.12.2017
Elsevier Science Ltd
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:This paper re-examines and clarifies the long-believed optimization conditions of electromagnetic and piezoelectric energy harvesting from base-excited vibration. In terms of electromagnetic energy harvesting, it is typically believed that the maximum power is achieved when the excitation frequency and electrical damping equal the natural frequency and mechanical damping of the mechanical system respectively. We will show that this optimization condition is only valid when the acceleration amplitude of base excitation is constant and an approximation for small mechanical damping when the excitation displacement amplitude is constant. To this end, a two-variable optimization analysis, involving the normalized excitation frequency and electrical damping ratio, is performed to derive the exact optimization condition of each case. When the excitation displacement amplitude is constant, we analytically show that, in contrast to the long-believed optimization condition, the optimal excitation frequency and electrical damping are always larger than the natural frequency and mechanical damping ratio respectively. In particular, when the mechanical damping ratio exceeds a critical value, the optimization condition is no longer valid. Instead, the average power generally increases as the excitation frequency and electrical damping ratio increase. Furthermore, the optimization analysis is extended to consider parasitic electrical losses, which also shows different results when compared with existing literature. When the excitation acceleration amplitude is constant, on the other hand, the exact optimization condition is identical to the long-believed one. In terms of piezoelectric energy harvesting, it is commonly believed that the optimal power efficiency is achieved when the excitation and the short or open circuit frequency of the harvester are equal. Via a similar two-variable optimization analysis, we analytically show that the optimal excitation frequency depends on the mechanical damping ratio and does not equal the short or open circuit frequency. Finally, the optimal excitation frequencies and resistive loads are derived in closed-form.
ISSN:0022-460X
1095-8568
DOI:10.1016/j.jsv.2017.08.032