Toxicological sensitivity of protozoa to pesticides and nanomaterials: A prospect review

Protozoa are sensitive indicators of pollutant toxicity. This review presents and discusses the toxicological studies of protozoa and the toxicological conventional test species (Daphnia magna) by pesticides and nanomaterials, particularly comparing the sensitivity of through relative tolerance anal...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inChemosphere (Oxford) Vol. 339; p. 139749
Main Authors Hou, Chunyu, Shi, Tianyi, Wang, Wenyuan, Han, Mei, Pan, Xuming, Wang, Li, Lee, Duu-Jong
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published England Elsevier Ltd 01.10.2023
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:Protozoa are sensitive indicators of pollutant toxicity. This review presents and discusses the toxicological studies of protozoa and the toxicological conventional test species (Daphnia magna) by pesticides and nanomaterials, particularly comparing the sensitivity of through relative tolerance analysis, Z-score, and species sensitivity index. The sensitivity of different species of protozoa varies greatly. The protozoa Paramecium sp. and Tetrahymena sp. are not sensitive species; conversely, Urostyla sp. is sensitive to dimethoate and nanomaterials Ag-NPs, respectively ZnO-NPs, and CuO-NPs, fits the use as an indicator species on these substances. The prospects to explore scientific toxicity exposure protocols, expand the protozoan species examined, and screen the sensitive species under the protocols are discussed. This prospect review advances the knowledge for including the sensitive protozoa as an indicator species in comprehensive toxicological analysis for pesticides and nanomaterials. [Display omitted] •Some protozoa are sensitive indicators of toxicology•Urostyla sp. shows higher sensitivity and fits the criterion as an indicator organism•The protozoan subject species group should be expanded•The method of protozoa toxicology experiment needs to be standardized
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
ObjectType-Review-3
content type line 23
ISSN:0045-6535
1879-1298
1879-1298
DOI:10.1016/j.chemosphere.2023.139749