Multichannel Scheduling and Spanning Trees: Throughput-Delay Tradeoff for Fast Data Collection in Sensor Networks
We investigate the tradeoff between two mutually conflicting performance objectives-throughput and delay-for fast, periodic data collection in tree-based sensor networks arbitrarily deployed in 2-D. Two primary factors that affect the data collection rate (throughput) and timeliness (delay) are: 1)...
Saved in:
Published in | IEEE/ACM transactions on networking Vol. 19; no. 6; pp. 1731 - 1744 |
---|---|
Main Authors | , , , |
Format | Journal Article |
Language | English |
Published |
New York
IEEE
01.12.2011
The Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers, Inc. (IEEE) |
Subjects | |
Online Access | Get full text |
Cover
Loading…
Summary: | We investigate the tradeoff between two mutually conflicting performance objectives-throughput and delay-for fast, periodic data collection in tree-based sensor networks arbitrarily deployed in 2-D. Two primary factors that affect the data collection rate (throughput) and timeliness (delay) are: 1) efficiency of the link scheduling protocol, and 2) structure of the routing tree in terms of its node degrees and radius. In this paper, we utilize multiple frequency channels and design an efficient link scheduling protocol that gives a constant factor approximation on the optimal throughput in delivering aggregated data from all the nodes to the sink. To minimize the maximum delay subject to a given throughput bound, we also design an (α, β)-bicriteria approximation algorithm to construct a Bounded-Degree Minimum-Radius Spanning Tree, with the radius of the tree at most β times the minimum possible radius for a given degree bound Δ * , and the degree of any node at most Δ * + α , where α and β are positive constants. Lastly, we evaluate the efficiency of our algorithms on different types of spanning trees and show that multichannel scheduling, combined with optimal routing topologies, can achieve the best of both worlds in terms of maximizing the aggregated data collection rate and minimizing the maximum packet delay. |
---|---|
Bibliography: | ObjectType-Article-1 SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1 ObjectType-Feature-2 content type line 14 ObjectType-Article-2 ObjectType-Feature-1 content type line 23 |
ISSN: | 1063-6692 1558-2566 |
DOI: | 10.1109/TNET.2011.2146273 |