Stuck in the Thicket? Social Research under the First Data Protection Principle

• Published in: International journal of law and information technology Vol. 19; no. 2; pp. 133 - 152
• Main Author: Erdos, D.
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: 01.06.2011
• Subjects: Data protection; European Union; Law; Social sciences
• ISSN: 0967-0769; 1464-3693
• DOI: 10.1093/ijlit/ear001

Through a systematic analysis of the UK's Data Protection Act's first data protection principle, this article demonstrates that the EU data protection regime seriously threatens research into social (including political and historical) affairs. The rules for registering processing with the data protection authority, providing the data subject with information notification and the severe limitations on the processing of sensitive personal data are all in serious tension with certain types of important social research including that which is covert, deceptive, identifiable or critical. Additionally, the complexity of the law inevitably leads "risk-averse" universities to further restrict research activity. This not only curtails academic freedom but also suppresses knowledge production in ways which damage society generally. The article concludes by contrasting the onerous regulation of "research" with the significantly more liberal regime for "journalism literature and art". It argues that data protection authorities and others should consider whether social research might benefit from this more liberal regime. Even if that proves unachievable, these issues should be addressed in the review of the law now underway. Adapted from the source document.