An experimental comparison of half-scale rockfall protection sandwich structures

Protection against falling rocks often requires the building of civil engineering structures such as soil reinforced embankments. A recent development consists of building a sandwich cellular structure for this purpose. Cellular structures are efficient technological solutions widely used in civil e...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inStructure Under Shock and ImpactWIT Press XI Vol. 113; pp. 15 - 26
Main Authors HEYMANN, A, LAMBERT, S, HAZA-ROZIER, E, VINCESLAS, G, GOTTELAND, P
Format Conference Proceeding Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Southampton WIT 2010
W I T Press
WIT Press
SeriesStructure Under Shock and ImpactWIT Press XI
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:Protection against falling rocks often requires the building of civil engineering structures such as soil reinforced embankments. A recent development consists of building a sandwich cellular structure for this purpose. Cellular structures are efficient technological solutions widely used in civil engineering for various applications. These structures also appear to be well suited to resist rockfall and to act as protective structures against impacts. This paper investigates the behaviour of three sandwich structures based on half-scale experiments. The 1.5 m high cellular sandwich structures were leaned against a concrete wall with the facing made of geocells filled with a coarse granular material. Three different granular materials were used for the kernel part of the sandwich (between the facing and the wall). The experiments were carried out with dead load \“pendular” impacts by a 260 kg spherical boulder with maximal impact energy of 10 kJ. The aim was to evaluate the ability of each kernel material for reducing the stress on the concrete wall.
Bibliography:SourceType-Other Sources-1
ObjectType-Article-1
content type line 63
ObjectType-Feature-2
ISBN:9781845644666
1845644662
ISSN:1746-4498
1743-3509
DOI:10.2495/SU100021