Prolonged Electro‐muscular Incapacitation in a Porcine Model Causes Spinal Injury

Conducted electrical weapons are designed to cause temporary electro‐muscular incapacitation (EMI) without significant injury. The objective of this study was to assess the risk and cause of spinal injury due to exposure to a benchtop EMI device. Porcine subjects were exposed to 19 and 40 Hz electri...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inJournal of forensic sciences Vol. 65; no. 1; pp. 144 - 153
Main Authors Burns, Jennie M., Kamykowski, Michael G., Moreno, Justin A., Jirjis, Michael B.
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published United States Wiley Subscription Services, Inc 01.01.2020
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text
ISSN0022-1198
1556-4029
1556-4029
DOI10.1111/1556-4029.14177

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:Conducted electrical weapons are designed to cause temporary electro‐muscular incapacitation (EMI) without significant injury. The objective of this study was to assess the risk and cause of spinal injury due to exposure to a benchtop EMI device. Porcine subjects were exposed to 19 and 40 Hz electrical stimuli for a prolonged duration of 30 sec. X‐ray imaging, necropsy, and accelerometry found that lumbosacral spinal fractures occurred in at least 89% of all subjects, regardless of the stimulus group, and were likely caused by musculoskeletal fatigue‐related stress in the lumbosacral spine. Spinal fractures occurred in the porcine model at an unusually high rate compared to human. This may be due to both the prolonged duration of electrical stimulation and significant musculoskeletal differences between humans and pigs, which suggests that the porcine model is not a good model of EMI‐induced spinal fracture in humans.
Bibliography:Work was supported by the U.S. Department of Defense Non‐Lethal Weapons Program, Joint Non‐Lethal Weapons Directorate.
The U.S. Department of Defense Non‐Lethal Weapons Program, Joint Non‐Lethal Weapons Directorate provided all funding for this research. The opinions expressed on this document, electronic or otherwise, are solely those of the author(s). They do not represent an endorsement by or the views of the United States Air Force, the Department of Defense, or the United States Government.
ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 14
content type line 23
ISSN:0022-1198
1556-4029
1556-4029
DOI:10.1111/1556-4029.14177