Recent changes in colony sizes of two seabird species in Scotland are not strongly influenced by Birds Directive status of the colony

• Published in: Ibis (London, England) Vol. 165; no. 1; pp. 322 - 327
• Main Author: Furness, Robert W.
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: Oxford Blackwell Publishing Ltd 01.01.2023
• Subjects: Animal breeding; Aquatic birds; bird population trends; Birds; Breeding; Breeding sites; Carrying capacity; census data; Colonies; Conservation; conservation policy; Conservation status; Great Black‐backed Gull; Great Skua; Larus marinus; population dynamics; Protected species; Scotland; Seabirds; special protection area; Species; Stercorariidae; Stercorarius skua; Threatened species; Wildlife conservation; United Kingdom > UK; Scotland
• ISSN: 0019-1019; 1474-919X
• DOI: 10.1111/ibi.13127

Special Protection Areas (SPAs) designated under the EU Birds Directive have improved the conservation status of many terrestrial bird species in Europe, but protecting breeding sites may be less effective for highly mobile birds such as seabirds. Colony census data for Great Skuas Stercorarius skua and Great Black‐backed Gulls Larus marinus in Scotland show that breeding numbers have fared no better in sites where these species are SPA breeding features and, counter‐intuitively, the evidence indicates better performance in non‐SPA colonies, most likely because non‐SPA colonies are generally smaller so are less subject to density‐dependent competition. The main drivers of population change are widespread rather than colony‐based in these two species with recent reductions in carrying capacity. Many other seabird species are vulnerable to similar widespread pressures so seabird conservation strategy needs to focus on mitigating these pressures, as designation of seabird breeding sites as SPAs is not enough to ensure effective seabird conservation.