Peri‐implant mucosal response to implant‐supported overdentures: A systematic review and meta‐analysis
Objectives To systematically review and evaluate the effects of different types of attachments, implant numbers and loading protocols on the peri‐implant mucosa of implant‐supported overdentures (ISODs). Background The impact of peri‐implant tissue health on the ISOD treatment outcome is unclear, an...
Saved in:
Published in | Gerodontology Vol. 38; no. 1; pp. 27 - 40 |
---|---|
Main Authors | , , |
Format | Journal Article |
Language | English |
Published |
England
01.03.2021
|
Subjects | |
Online Access | Get full text |
Cover
Loading…
Summary: | Objectives
To systematically review and evaluate the effects of different types of attachments, implant numbers and loading protocols on the peri‐implant mucosa of implant‐supported overdentures (ISODs).
Background
The impact of peri‐implant tissue health on the ISOD treatment outcome is unclear, and current evidence is inadequate on this aspect.
Materials and Methods
A systematic literature search for randomised controlled trials or prospective studies was conducted in indexed databases from 1995 to April 2020. The focused question was as follows: How does the peri‐implant mucosa respond to implant‐supported or implant‐tissue‐supported complete overdentures based on different types of attachments, implant numbers, and loading protocols, in terms of clinical outcomes achieved [plaque index (PI), gingival index (GI), probing pocket depth (PD) and bleeding index (BI)]? A random‐ or fixed‐effects model was applied to measure the significance of standardised mean differences (SMD) of PD between the groups.
Results
Seventeen studies met the eligibility criteria. The SMD for PD between splinted/bar and unsplinted/stud attachments was 0.10 mm (95% CI: −0.27 to 0.47; P = .60) and between 2‐ and 4‐implant groups was 0.15 mm (95% CI: −0.16 to 0.45; P = .34), which were not statistically significant. Significant difference (P = .003) was observed between immediate/early loading and delayed loading (SMD = 0.46 mm [95% CI: 0.16 to 0.75]).
Conclusions
Probing depth for the immediate loaded implants was significantly higher than for the delayed loading group. No attachment type, implant number or loading protocol seemed to have a clear advantage over the other, in terms of other peri‐implant mucosal outcome measures. |
---|---|
Bibliography: | ObjectType-Article-2 SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1 ObjectType-Feature-1 ObjectType-Review-4 content type line 23 ObjectType-Undefined-3 |
ISSN: | 0734-0664 1741-2358 |
DOI: | 10.1111/ger.12505 |