Z‐Score Reference Ranges for Umbilical Vein Diameter and Blood Flow Volume in Normal Fetuses
Objectives To establish Z‐scores for the diameter and blood flow volume of the umbilical vein (UV) in normal fetuses. Methods This was a prospective study involving 907 normal fetuses. We measured the diameter (Duv) of two different segments of the UV (FUV: the free loop of the UV; FIUV: the fetal i...
Saved in:
Published in | Journal of ultrasound in medicine Vol. 41; no. 4; pp. 907 - 916 |
---|---|
Main Authors | , , , , , , , , , |
Format | Journal Article |
Language | English |
Published |
Hoboken, USA
John Wiley & Sons, Inc
01.04.2022
|
Subjects | |
Online Access | Get full text |
Cover
Loading…
Summary: | Objectives
To establish Z‐scores for the diameter and blood flow volume of the umbilical vein (UV) in normal fetuses.
Methods
This was a prospective study involving 907 normal fetuses. We measured the diameter (Duv) of two different segments of the UV (FUV: the free loop of the UV; FIUV: the fetal intra‐abdominal UV). Next, we calculated the blood flow volume (Quv). Z‐scores were created for both Duv and Quv using gestational age, femur length, and biparietal diameter as independent variables.
Results
We successfully acquired 858 (94.6%) normal fetal measurements. Between 20 and 39 weeks, the Duv of the FUV and FIUV increased from 0.38 to 0.80 cm and from 0.33 to 0.70 cm, respectively. The Quv of the FUV and FIUV increased from 32.66 to 381.88 ml/min and from 31.50 to 360.15 ml/min, respectively. Linear or quadratic regression models were best fitted between the parameters of UV and the independent variables. Z‐scores were successfully determined for both the Duv and Quv.
Conclusions
The calculation of Z‐scores for the Duv and Quv is simple by applying standard statistical methods. These Z‐scores may be useful to evaluate placental circulation and provide a rationale for monitoring and evaluating the prognosis of fetuses. |
---|---|
Bibliography: | Correction added on 29 October 2021, after first online publication: Tables 1 and 2 have been corrected in this version. The authors have stated explicitly that there are no conflicts of interest in connection with this article. This study was supported by the Natural Science Foundation of Hunan Province (Grant number: 2017JJ4060), The Research Plan Foundation of the Health Commission of Hunan Province (Grant number: B2017159), and The National Natural Sciences Foundation of China (Grant number: 81801721). The funding bodies had no role in the design of the study, the collection, analysis, or interpretation of the data, or writing the manuscript. ObjectType-Article-1 SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1 ObjectType-Feature-2 content type line 23 |
ISSN: | 0278-4297 1550-9613 |
DOI: | 10.1002/jum.15774 |