Effect of shift to virtual teaching on active learning: A snapshot

• Published in: Journal of dental education Vol. 86; no. 8; pp. 976 - 989
• Main Authors: Dalal, Ayushi R., Joy‐Thomas, Anita R., Quock, Ryan L.
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: United States 01.08.2022
• Subjects: active learning; dental education; online learning; student engagement; virtual learning; virtual learning; dental education; active learning; student engagement; online learning
• ISSN: 0022-0337; 1930-7837
• DOI: 10.1002/jdd.12910

Purpose Active learning engages students via interaction for deeper understanding and retention. A global pandemic resulted in an abrupt mid‐semester transition from in‐person to virtual learning. This study examined student reporting on active learning before and after this transition. Methods First‐year DDS candidates took an anonymous survey, reflecting on three Spring (January–April) 2020 courses (lecture‐style, small‐group case‐based, and pre‐clinical). Survey questions included: (1) basic demographics, (2) reporting frequency (1–Never, 2–Rarely, 3–Sometimes, 4–Often, 5–Always) of active learning elements from a pre‐set list before/after the shift to online learning, and (3) Likert‐style questions regarding effects on active learning and learning environment preference. Results The traditional lecture course manifested two active learning activities in the category Sometimes prior to the transition to virtual; one of those activities (question and answer) experienced the most significant difference (p < 0.0001) in frequency change. The small group, case‐based course incorporated nine activities in‐person in the category Sometimes; although small significant differences (p ≤ 0.05) in frequency were noted for five of those activities between virtual and in‐person, these differences may have not have made a difference in practice. The pre‐clinical course incorporated four activities in the category Sometimes pre‐transition, with no significant differences detected in frequency. Students slightly leaned toward preferring in‐person for the small‐group and pre‐clinical courses, but had no preference for the traditional lecture course. Conclusions Course structure may correlate more with student experience of the frequency of active learning activities and preference for in‐person versus virtual environment than the environment itself.