Haptic Feedback Based on Movement Smoothness Improves Performance in a Perceptual-Motor Task

In many training scenarios, and in surgery in particular, feedback is provided to the trainee after the task has been performed, and the assessment is often qualitative in nature. In this paper, we demonstrate the effect of real-time objective performance feedback conveyed through a vibrotactile cue...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inIEEE transactions on haptics Vol. 15; no. 2; pp. 382 - 391
Main Authors Sullivan, Jennifer L., Pandey, Shivam, Byrne, Michael D., O'Malley, Marcia K.
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published New York IEEE 01.04.2022
The Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers, Inc. (IEEE)
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:In many training scenarios, and in surgery in particular, feedback is provided to the trainee after the task has been performed, and the assessment is often qualitative in nature. In this paper, we demonstrate the effect of real-time objective performance feedback conveyed through a vibrotactile cue. Subjects performed a mirror-tracing task that requires coordination and dexterity similar in nature to that required in endovascular surgery. Movement smoothness, a characteristic associated with skilled and coordinated movement, was measured by spectral arc length, a frequency-domain measure of smoothness. The smoothness-based performance metric was encoded as a vibrotactile cue displayed on the user's arm. Performance on the mirror tracing task with smoothness-based feedback was compared to position-based feedback (where the subject was alerted when they moved outside the path boundary) and to a no vibrotactile feedback control condition. Subjects receiving smoothness-based feedback altered their task completion strategies, resulting in faster task completion times, but their accuracy was slightly worse overall than the other two groups. In procedures such as endovascular surgery, the reduction of procedure time that could be achieved with smoothness-based feedback training may be advantageous, despite the fact that accuracy was inferior to that observed with no feedback or position-based feedback.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 14
content type line 23
ISSN:1939-1412
2329-4051
2329-4051
DOI:10.1109/TOH.2021.3126017