Cystatin C Concentration During the First Three Postnatal Days in Healthy Term Newborns

Cystatin C (Cys-C) concentration has not been examined sufficiently among healthy newborn population, particularly in terms of reference values. This study aimed to establish gender-, postnatal age- and birth weight-specific Cys-C concentration for healthy term newborns. Its objective was also to ex...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inZeitschrift fur Geburtshilfe und Neonatologie Vol. 226; no. 3; p. 193
Main Authors Mikulic, Vinka, Rogic, Dunja, Mikulic, Ivanka, Jerkovic Raguz, Marjana, Brzica, Jerko, Pandza Topic, Maja, Ljubić, Kristina, Tomic, Vajdana
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Germany 01.06.2022
Online AccessGet more information

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:Cystatin C (Cys-C) concentration has not been examined sufficiently among healthy newborn population, particularly in terms of reference values. This study aimed to establish gender-, postnatal age- and birth weight-specific Cys-C concentration for healthy term newborns. Its objective was also to examine if there were any differences between our measured concentration and the reference interval established by the CALIPER study. Serum samples from a total of 90 healthy term newborns were used to determine Cys-C concentration. Cys-C was measured within first three days of birth using particle-enhanced turbidimetric immunoassay (PETIA) on the Architect plus ci8200 analyzer. Median concentration of the Cys-C was 2.05 mg/L. There were no statistically significant differences in Cys-C concentration regarding gender (p=0.779), birth weight (p=0.505), postnatal age (p=0.512) or Apgar score (p=0.799). The value of the 2.5th and 97.5th percentile for Cys-C concentrations for girls was 0.93-3.15 mg/L and for boys it was 1.5-3.36 mg/L. Cys-C concentration in healthy term newborns does not depend on gender, birth weight, postnatal age, or Apgar score. Our measured concentration range of CyS-C in healthy newborns turned out to be slightly wider than the interval determined in the CALIPER study.
ISSN:1439-1651
DOI:10.1055/a-1727-6309