Examination of the dose distribution of volumetric modulated arc radiotherapy using a high-definition multi-leaf collimator for breast cancer patients with irradiated regional lymph nodes

BackgroundA high-definition multi-leaf collimator (HD-MLC) with 5- and 10-mm fine MLCs is useful for radiotherapy. However, it is difficult to irradiate the mammary gland and supraclavicular region using a HD-MLC because of the narrow field of volumetric modulated arc radiotherapy (VMAT). Therefore,...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inReports of practical oncology and radiotherapy Vol. 27; no. 4; pp. 634 - 643
Main Authors Matsumoto, Yoshitsugu, Kunieda, Etsuo, Futakami, Natsumi, Akiba, Takeshi, Nagao, Ryuta, Fukuzawa, Tsuyoshi, Katsumata, Tomomi, Kuroki, Toshihisa, Mikami, Tatsuya, Okumura, Yasuhiro, Souda, Kenji, Mutu, Eride, Sugawara, Akitomo
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Via Medica 2022
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:BackgroundA high-definition multi-leaf collimator (HD-MLC) with 5- and 10-mm fine MLCs is useful for radiotherapy. However, it is difficult to irradiate the mammary gland and supraclavicular region using a HD-MLC because of the narrow field of volumetric modulated arc radiotherapy (VMAT). Therefore, we aimed to evaluate the dose distribution of the VMAT dose using a HD-MLC in 15 patients with left breast cancer undergoing postoperative irradiation of breast and regional lymph nodes, including the internal mammary node. Materials and methodsThe following four plans were generated: three-arc VMAT using HD-MLC (HD-VMAT), two tangential arcs and one-arc VMAT using HD-MLC (tHD-VMAT), three-dimensional conformal radiotherapy (3DCRT) using HD-MLC, and two-arc VMAT using the Millennium 120-leaf MLC (M-VMAT). We assessed the doses to the target volume and organs at risk. ResultsThe target dose distributions were higher for HD-VMAT than 3DCRT. There were no significant differences in the heart mean dose (Dmean) or lung volume receiving 20 Gy (V20 Gy) between HD-VMAT and 3DCRT. The heart Dmean and lung V20 Gy of tHD-VMAT were higher than those of HD-VMAT, and the heart Dmean of M-VMAT was higher than that of HD-VMAT. However, the target doses of tHD-VMAT, M-VMAT, and HD-VMAT were equivalent. ConclusionsIn cases of the mammary gland and regional lymph node irradiation, including the internal mammary node in patients with left breast cancer, HD-VMAT was not inferior to M-VMAT and provided a better dose distribution to the target volume and organs at risk compared with 3DCRT and tHD-VMAT.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
ISSN:1507-1367
2083-4640
DOI:10.5603/RPOR.a2022.0081