Generalized-Extended-State-Observer and Equivalent-Input-Disturbance Methods for Active Disturbance Rejection: Deep Observation and Comparison

Active disturbance-rejection methods are effective in estimating and rejecting disturbances in both transient and steady-state responses. This paper presents a deep observation on and a comparison between two of those methods: the generalized extended-state observer (GESO) and the equivalent input d...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inIEEE/CAA journal of automatica sinica Vol. 10; no. 4; pp. 957 - 968
Main Authors She, Jinhua, Miyamoto, Kou, Han, Qing-Long, Wu, Min, Hashimoto, Hiroshi, Wang, Qing-Guo
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Piscataway Chinese Association of Automation (CAA) 01.04.2023
The Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers, Inc. (IEEE)
School of Engineering,Tokyo University of Technology,Hachioji,Tokyo 192-0982,Japan%Institute of Technology,Shimizu Corporation,Koto,Tokyo 135-0044,Japan%School of Science,Computing and Engineering Technologies,Swinburne University of Technology,Melbourne,VIC 3122,Australia%School of Automation,China University of Geosciences,Wuhan 430074,the Hubei Key Laboratory of Advanced Control and Intelligent Automation for Complex Systems,and the Engineering Research Center of Intelligent Technology for Geo-Exploration,Ministry of Education,Wuhan 430074,China%School of Industrial Technology,Advanced Institute of Industrial Technology,Tokyo 140-0011,Japan%Institute of Artificial Intelligence and Future Networks,Beijing Normal University,Zhuhai 519087
Guangdong Key Lab of AI and Multi-Modal Data Processing,Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Interdisciplinary Research and Application for Data Science ,and BNU-HKBU United International College,Zhuhai 519087,China
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:Active disturbance-rejection methods are effective in estimating and rejecting disturbances in both transient and steady-state responses. This paper presents a deep observation on and a comparison between two of those methods: the generalized extended-state observer (GESO) and the equivalent input disturbance (EID) from assumptions, system configurations, stability conditions, system design, disturbance-rejection performance, and extensibility. A time-domain index is introduced to assess the disturbance-rejection performance. A detailed observation of disturbance-suppression mechanisms reveals the superiority of the EID approach over the GESO method. A comparison between these two methods shows that assumptions on disturbances are more practical and the adjustment of disturbance-rejection performance is easier for the EID approach than for the GESO method.
ISSN:2329-9266
2329-9274
DOI:10.1109/JAS.2022.105929