The conversion of exposures due to radon into the effective dose: the epidemiological approach

• Published in: Radiation and environmental biophysics Vol. 56; no. 4; pp. 353 - 364
• Main Author: Beck, T. R.
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: Berlin/Heidelberg Springer Berlin Heidelberg 01.11.2017; Springer Nature B.V
• Subjects: Adolescent; Adult; Age; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Air Pollutants, Radioactive - adverse effects; Alpha particles; Alpha rays; Biological and Medical Physics; Biophysics; Cancer; Child; Child, Preschool; Coefficients; Conversion; Dosimetry; Ecosystems; Effects of Radiation/Radiation Protection; Environmental Physics; Epidemiology; Exposure; Female; Housing; Humans; Infant; Infant, Newborn; Lung cancer; Lung Neoplasms - epidemiology; Lung Neoplasms - etiology; Male; Middle Aged; Miners; Monitoring/Environmental Analysis; Neoplasms, Radiation-Induced - epidemiology; Neoplasms, Radiation-Induced - etiology; Occupational exposure; Occupational Exposure - adverse effects; Original Article; Physics; Physics and Astronomy; Population; Radiation Dosage; Radon; Radon - adverse effects; Reviews; Risk; Risk Assessment; Weighting; Young Adult; α Radiation; Radon risk; Dose conversion; Effective dose
• ISSN: 0301-634X; 1432-2099
• DOI: 10.1007/s00411-017-0714-5

The risks and dose conversion coefficients for residential and occupational exposures due to radon were determined with applying the epidemiological risk models to ICRP representative populations. The dose conversion coefficient for residential radon was estimated with a value of 1.6 mSv year −1 per 100 Bq m −3 (3.6 mSv per WLM), which is significantly lower than the corresponding value derived from the biokinetic and dosimetric models. The dose conversion coefficient for occupational exposures with applying the risk models for miners was estimated with a value of 14 mSv per WLM, which is in good accordance with the results of the dosimetric models. To resolve the discrepancy regarding residential radon, the ICRP approaches for the determination of risks and doses were reviewed. It could be shown that ICRP overestimates the risk for lung cancer caused by residential radon. This can be attributed to a wrong population weighting of the radon-induced risks in its epidemiological approach. With the approach in this work, the average risks for lung cancer were determined, taking into account the age-specific risk contributions of all individuals in the population. As a result, a lower risk coefficient for residential radon was obtained. The results from the ICRP biokinetic and dosimetric models for both, the occupationally exposed working age population and the whole population exposed to residential radon, can be brought in better accordance with the corresponding results of the epidemiological approach, if the respective relative radiation detriments and a radiation-weighting factor for alpha particles of about ten are used.