Socioeconomic Status Association With Dependency From Objective and Subjective Assessments: A Cross-Sectional Study

Background The effect of socioeconomic status (SES) on dependency is still complex and not fully clear. The purposes of this study are to assess the association between SES and dependency personality disorder (DPD) using both objective and subjective assessments. Methods A cross-sectional study was...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inFrontiers in psychiatry Vol. 13; p. 898686
Main Authors Pan, YiYang, Aierken, Ayizuhere, Ding, XiWen, Chen, Yuan, Li, Ying
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Frontiers Media S.A 29.06.2022
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:Background The effect of socioeconomic status (SES) on dependency is still complex and not fully clear. The purposes of this study are to assess the association between SES and dependency personality disorder (DPD) using both objective and subjective assessments. Methods A cross-sectional study was conducted in 27 locations in China among 1,276 general residents aged 60 years and above through a complex multistage sampling design. Data were collected using a questionnaire by well-trained investigators through face-to-face interviews. The DPD was assessed using a standardized Chinese version of the Minnesota Multiphasic Personality Inventory-II scale. Objective SES was assessed by the combination of education levels, individual income, preretirement occupation, and medical insurance. Subjective SES was measured using the MacArthur Scale. The logistic regression analysis was used to evaluate the association between objective SES and DPD. Analysis of covariance was conducted to compare the mean of DPD scores in different levels of SES. Results The results of the chi-squared test showed that the levels of objective SES were associated with DPD, depression, social resources, and region. The logistic regression analysis showed a significant negative association between the levels of objective SES and DPD. The odds ratio was 1.84 (95% confidence interval, 1.07–3.18) after adjusting for important confounding factors. The analysis of covariance showed differences in the mean of DPD scores among different groups defined by different levels of SES. Conclusion The levels of SES were negatively associated with DPD, and subjective SES had a stronger association with DPD than objective SES. The effect of subjective SES on DPD is possibly associated with the perception of position in the social hierarchy.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
This article was submitted to Aging Psychiatry, a section of the journal Frontiers in Psychiatry
Edited by: Wuxiang Xie, Peking University, China
Reviewed by: Haewon Byeon, Inje University, South Korea; Cristiano Capurso, University of Foggia, Italy; William Sulis, McMaster University, Canada; Shi-Bin Wang, Guangdong Mental Health Center, China
ISSN:1664-0640
1664-0640
DOI:10.3389/fpsyt.2022.898686