Transparency in Residency Education: Nominating Residents for Fellowships and Awards

• Published in: Academic psychiatry Vol. 43; no. 2; pp. 252 - 253
• Main Authors: Cabaniss, Deborah L., Devlin, Michael, Rim, James I.
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: Cham Springer International Publishing 01.04.2019; Springer Nature B.V
• Subjects: Awards; Awards & honors; Awards and Prizes; Committees; Decision making; Departments; Education, Medical, Graduate; Employee promotions; Ethics; Evaluators; Feature: Letter to the Editor; Fellowships; Fellowships and Scholarships - methods; Fellowships and Scholarships - trends; Focus Groups; Graduates; Human subjects; Humans; Internship and Residency; Job satisfaction; Justice; Leadership; Medical Education; Medical School Faculty; Medicine; Medicine & Public Health; Morale; Nominations; Opportunities; Procedural justice; Promotion (Occupational); Psychiatry; Review boards; School faculty; New York; United States > US
• ISSN: 1042-9670; 1545-7230; 1545-7230
• DOI: 10.1007/s40596-018-0999-y

In a study concerning methods of job promotion in various private sector organizations, transparency was positively associated with perceptions of procedural justice and job satisfaction [1]. The Institutional Review Board of the New York State Psychiatric Institute reviewed this study (NYSPI IRB project number 7723) and determined that it did not meet the definition of human subject research. Compliance with Ethical Standards Ethical Considerations The Institutional Review Board of the New York State Psychiatric Institute reviewed this study (NYSPI IRB project number 7723) and determined that it did not meet the definition of human subject research.