Finite Element Analysis of Stress Distribution in Flat and Elevated-Rim Polyethylene Acetabular Liners

No study has compared flat and elevated-rim polyethylene liners in terms of stress distribution on the bearing surface. The purpose of this study was to investigate the difference in stress distribution between flat and elevated-rim polyethylene liners. A stress analysis was performed by using the 3...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inClinics in orthopedic surgery Vol. 12; no. 3; pp. 291 - 297
Main Authors Kaku, Nobuhiro, Tanaka, Ai, Tagomori, Hiroaki, Tsumura, Hiroshi
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Korea (South) The Korean Orthopaedic Association 01.09.2020
대한정형외과학회
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:No study has compared flat and elevated-rim polyethylene liners in terms of stress distribution on the bearing surface. The purpose of this study was to investigate the difference in stress distribution between flat and elevated-rim polyethylene liners. A stress analysis was performed by using the 3-dimensional finite element method. The cup was placed at an open angle of 20°, the flat liner and the liner with a 10° elevation was placed at inclination angles of 80°, 70°, and 60°. Compared with the 60° flat liner, the 80° and 70° flat liners showed higher stress at the liner edge. In the elevated-rim liner, the stress was high at the liner edge along the cup edge. When the von Mises equivalent stress was applied to each element of the liner, the high stress area (volume) was the largest for the 80° flat liner, second largest for the 80° elevated-rim liner, and third largest for the 70° flat liner. The average contact pressure also followed the same order. Elevated-rim liners affect the stress distribution by increasing the area of contact. However, since elevated-rim liners exhibit high stress at the cup edge, they are likely to result in new problems including liner failure. These findings could aid surgeons in the selection of liners and determination of revision methods such as isolated liner exchange vs. acetabular cup revision for a well-fixed metal cup with a higher inclination angle in revision total hip arthroplasty.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
https://www.ecios.org/search.php?where=aview&id=10.4055/cios19145&code=0157CIOS&vmode=FULL
ISSN:2005-291X
2005-4408
DOI:10.4055/cios19145